RISK ASSESSMENT AND BROWNFIELDS-DETERMINING EXPOSURE
TO SITE CONTAMINANTS
Written By:
Dr. Henry P. Shotwell, Ph.D., CIH
Senior Vice-President
Atlantic Environmental, Inc.
The USEPA’s Brownfields Program was developed to facilitate
the rehabilitation of contaminated property for re-development.
EPA has set forth criteria that must be met for a revitalized
property to be used for residential, commercial or industrial
purposes. The main thrust of these criteria is the
long-term protection of residents or visitors (including
shoppers and business employees).
As Industrial Hygienists, we may be called upon to
evaluate the health risks to construction workers actively
engaged in the remediation project, and to recommend
engineering controls and/or personal protective equipment
sufficient to protect on-site workers and visitors from
potential exposures to contaminants on, in or under
the subject property. For the most part, remediation
and re-development construction workers are primarily
facing inhalation and dermal exposures. Ingestion of
contaminated water, as well as dermal absorption of
contaminants in water are unlikely. Consequently, this
risk assessment protocol will deal with exposure potentials
that might be experienced in any OSHA-regulated endeavor.
As part of any Brownfields project, preliminary soil
and groundwater tests characterize the nature and amount
of contaminants present. A history of potential contaminants
arising from previous uses of the property will add
to the characterization. Unless there are several peak
areas of contamination whose origins are not known,
most brownfield areas have fairly uniform levels of
common contaminants throughout either the entire property
or are present within a narrowly defined area, and is
corroborated by the prior use history of the property.
For example, a coal-gasification production facility
may have occupied a “foot print” that was much smaller
than the total property area. Finding high levels of
semi-volatiles in and around the area that had been
occupied by the facility itself would be expected.
High levels in remote corners of the property would
not.
One approach to initiating the risk assessment process
is to isolate the geophysical area with the highest
concentration of the contaminants of interest and assume
that the highest level of each contaminant of interest
found in the soil assays is uniformly present throughout
the contaminated area. This assumption will allow us
to calculate a “worst-case” exposure scenario for each
of the contaminants of interest.
Further assumptions are as follows:
- All remediation work will be done at the highest
summertime temperatures.
- Volatile contaminants adhering to soil particles
will be completely released when the soil is exposed
to atmospheric air.
- The concentration of soil particles in air (dust)
will average 3 milligrams per cubic Meter of air.
- Contact with contaminated groundwater will not occur.
- Exposures will occur over 8-hour workdays.
Assume a Brownfields project where prior use history
shows an auto body repair shop had occupied the property
for 35 years. The property had been undeveloped woodland
before that. Soil sampling showed the presence of toluene,
xylene, benzene and ethyl benzene, ranging from a low
of 350 mg per kilogram of soil to a high of 1,600 mg
benzene per kilogram of soil. For the purposes of illustration,
only the high benzene level will be treated further.
Extrapolating the 1,600 mg/kg to be present throughout
the property, we find a benzene concentration of 1,600
mg benzene per million mg soil; or, 0.0016 mg benzene
per mg soil/dust. This can also be expressed as 1.6
micrograms benzene per mg soil/dust.
When excavation begins, the exposed soil will generate
a dust level of 3 mg per cubic Meter of air. Since
each mg of soil (now called dust) contains 1.6 micrograms
of benzene, a dust concentration of 3 mg per cubic Meter
will contain 4.8 mg benzene per cubic Meter of air.
OSHA’s PEL for an 8-hour exposure to benzene is 1 part
per million, Time-Weighted Average, 8 hours (1 ppm,
TWA-8). A soil concentration of 1,600 mg per kg can
be expected to produce a “worst-case” inhalation exposure
of 4.8 mg/cuM or 1.5 ppm which clearly exceeds the OSHA
PEL.
During the early construction/excavation phase of the
project, appropriate respiratory protection should be
provided to potentially exposed workers and breathing
zone air samples collected to verify the actual exposure
concentration. If several sets of test results are
below 0.5 ppm benzene, the use of respirators can be
discontinued.
This approach will provide protection to on-site workers
without demanding expensive and uncomfortable respiratory
protection when it may not be necessary.
For more information, contact Robert Sheriff, President
at 973-366-4660 or e-mail at info@atlenv.com.